All of the examples

Striking Examples · Day 25 · Two men, and the truth between them

Enslaved

An owned slave who controls nothing, and a free man who gives

The example

An-Nahl 16:75

The picture:
An owned slave, and a free man who spends
The mirror:
Whose service you are really in
Retold from Nouman Ali Khan's Striking Examples From the Qur'anWatch the original

Picture two men standing side by side in the same market. The first is owned. He was bought for a task, and outside that task he can do nothing: he cannot go where he wants, cannot keep what he earns, cannot decide a single thing about his own life. The second was handed real wealth, good and abundant, and he is so full of it that he gives it away, quietly when no one is watching and openly when they are. Now look at them together and answer one question: are these two the same?

That is the example Allah strikes in Surah an-Nahl, and this is day twenty-five of twenty-seven, retold faithfully from Nouman Ali Khan's series. It looks, at first, like a small picture about two unequal men. It is really an argument about who is worth worshipping, and by the end it turns into something none of us expect: a picture of freedom itself.

Two men in the market

Before any meaning, just see the scene, because to the first listeners it was not a metaphor from a book; it was the marketplace down the road. Slavery was a vast institution across the world then, and an ordinary part of Arab life. You went to the market the way you go to buy a certain car or a certain laptop, looking for the thing that fits the job you have. There were animals for sale, and there were people for sale, in a line of their own. A man who needed someone strong for the farm came looking for someone strong for the farm. He weighed up the purchase, he spent his money, and he bought a human being for a single purpose.

And that purpose was the whole of that person's life. The master could say, in effect: I bought you to work the farm, so the best day of your life is a day working the farm, and the worst day of your life is a day working the farm, and ten years from now you will be working the farm, and then one day you will be too old, and that will be that. He owns nothing. He keeps nothing. He decides nothing. Hold that figure clearly in your mind, because the second man is about to be set down right beside him.

The example Allah strikes

ضَرَبَ ٱللَّهُ مَثَلًا عَبْدًا مَّمْلُوكًا لَّا يَقْدِرُ عَلَىٰ شَىْءٍ وَمَن رَّزَقْنَٰهُ مِنَّا رِزْقًا حَسَنًا فَهُوَ يُنفِقُ مِنْهُ سِرًّا وَجَهْرًا ۖ هَلْ يَسْتَوُۥنَ ۚ ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ ۚ بَلْ أَكْثَرُهُمْ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ

“Allāh presents an example: a slave [who is] owned and unable to do a thing and he to whom We have provided from Us good provision, so he spends from it secretly and publicly. Can they be equal? Praise to Allāh! But most of them do not know.”

Surah an-Nahl 16:75 Read 16:75 with tafsir

Two figures, then. The first: an owned slave who has no power over anything. Nouman Ali Khan notes that the words allow more than one shade at once, so the brief language asks us to think harder, not less. It can mean the slave is not able to get himself out of his situation, locked into a life that belongs to someone else. And it can mean he is simply unable, that whatever he is handed to do he cannot manage, the way a hired hand who breaks every tool and bolts at the sight of a horse is no use to the one who bought him. Either way the picture is the same: total powerlessness, a human being with no control held over him.

The second figure is the opposite in every line: someone given good provision, and given it generously, who spends from it both in secret and in the open. Then the question, sharp and short: are they equal? And before anyone can even answer, the verse answers itself, alhamdulillah, all praise belongs to Allah, but most of them do not know.

Everything has been put in your service

خَلَقَ ٱلْإِنسَٰنَ مِن نُّطْفَةٍ فَإِذَا هُوَ خَصِيمٌ مُّبِينٌ

“He created man from a sperm-drop; then at once he is a clear adversary.”

Surah an-Nahl 16:4 Read 16:4 with tafsir

An example, as this whole series keeps insisting, sits inside a larger lesson, and Nouman Ali Khan walks us back through the surah so the picture lands with its full weight. An-Nahl returns again and again to one idea: that everything has been placed in the service of the human being. The cattle, in which you find warmth and food and beauty, and which carry your loads to lands you could never reach on your own. The rain sent down from the sky, and the crops and olives and palms and grapes it raises for you. The sea, subdued so you can travel it. The night and the day, the sun and the moon and the stars, set in their courses so you can measure your time and find your way. Things immeasurably larger and stronger than you, all turned toward serving you.

And it opens earlier still, with you. He created the human being from a mere drop of fluid, and then, suddenly, here he is, an open arguer, standing up to dispute with the very One who made him. You were nothing in particular, and Allah made you a full human being, and the gift is repaid with audacity. That is the soil this parable grows in: a world bending to serve us, and a creature so quick to forget who arranged it all.

Why He says slave, and then owned

Now to the wording, which is where Nouman Ali Khan opens the parable like a lock. Allah does not only say slave; He says a slave who is owned, abd mamluk. But the word slave already carries owned inside it, so why add it? Because the word abd, on its own, belongs to Allah. In the Qur'an it is the title of the servant of Allah, and all of humanity are, in truth, the abd of Allah. So a listener who hears only abd will instinctively complete it: servant of whom? Servant of Allah. The extra word, owned, is what pulls the picture away from that and points it somewhere else, to a person owned by someone other than Allah.

There is a second thread he draws from the form of the word. Where slave names something a person simply is, owned reads more like something done to a person, a state they came into. The language itself, he suggests, hints that being owned by anyone other than Allah is not anyone's natural condition. There was a time this person was not owned at all, when he was free, and a servant of Allah alone, and only later came to be owned by another. Keep that quietly in mind. It is the seed of the turn at the end.

The Master who provides before He asks

وَيَعْبُدُونَ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ مَا لَا يَمْلِكُ لَهُمْ رِزْقًا مِّنَ ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ شَيْـًٔا وَلَا يَسْتَطِيعُونَ

“And they worship besides Allāh that which does not possess for them [the power of] provision from the heavens and the earth at all, and [in fact], they are unable.”

Surah an-Nahl 16:73 Read 16:73 with tafsir

Watch what Allah does with the second figure, because here the parable quietly tells you what it has been about all along. With the slave, the owner is never even named, as if those masters are not worth mentioning. With the free man, Allah does not say I own someone. He says We provided someone. He puts Himself into the verse, and the first thing He says of the relationship is not that He takes, but that He gives.

Sit with how strange that is against everything a slave market teaches. When a master buys a slave, the purchase is for the master's benefit, never the slave's. But Allah opens the bond by benefiting the servant, because you cannot benefit Allah at all. This is the exact opposite of the false gods two verses earlier: idols that own no provision for anyone, not from the skies, not from the earth, and have no power to provide even if they wished. These were the very gods the Prophet ﷺ found his people bowing to in Makkah, where this surah was revealed, and the tawhid he called them to is the whole argument this picture is making. People laid out food and offerings before those idols to get something back. Allah, Nouman Ali Khan points out, wants nothing from you. He is not a god you feed to be fed. He gives first, and He gives from Himself, a good and beautiful provision, before He asks for anything at all.

An ayah of freedom

فَلَا تَضْرِبُوا۟ لِلَّهِ ٱلْأَمْثَالَ ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ

“So do not assert similarities to Allāh. Indeed, Allāh knows and you do not know.”

Surah an-Nahl 16:74 Read 16:74 with tafsir

Now the picture turns over completely, the way Allah loves to flip an image the Arab mind thought it had figured out. The slave could do nothing; he was useless, restricted, owned. But the servant of Allah, given so much, is not restricted at all. He spends. He has so much that he gives it to others. To the Arab ear, giving belonged to the powerful, the wealthy, the masters. Here it belongs to the abd, the servant, and that single word breaks the whole expectation: the truly rich one in the picture is the slave who gives.

And he gives in secret and in the open, both, which means he is not giving to be seen and not giving because he is forced. He gives because he is grateful: my Master is generous with me, so I will be generous to His creation. There is no fear in it, no master holding a service over his head, only thanks. So look at what Allah has really set side by side. Not two slaves. A slave and a free man. One owned by something powerless, able to do nothing; one in the service of the One who provides, and free enough to give. This, Nouman Ali Khan says, is the heart of it: slavery to anything other than Allah is slavery, and slavery to Allah is freedom. It is, in his words, an ayah of liberty. Which is exactly why the verse just before it warns us not to strike comparisons for Allah at all: He knows, and we do not, and the false gods we set beside Him are the powerless slave in the picture, never the Master.

The mirror: whose service are you in

Now the picture turns toward you, and it asks one quiet question. Everyone serves something. The verse is not really about whether you are owned; it is about who, or what, owns you. There is a kind of ownership that takes everything and gives nothing back, that buys you for a use and discards you the moment you stop being useful, the way the powerless idols in these verses give nothing yet demand offerings. Money can own you like that. Status, an image, the approval of a crowd, a habit, a fear, can all own you exactly like that: they take and take, they decide your days, and they hand you nothing you could ever give away.

And then there is the One who begins by providing, who wants nothing from you because He needs nothing from you, and whose service does not shrink a person but fills him until he overflows. Remember the seed buried in the wording: being owned by anything other than Allah was never your natural state. You were made free, a servant of Allah alone. So the parable is really an invitation home, and it ends the way the free man lives, in gratitude: alhamdulillah. Do not stand in the line of the owned, controlled by something that can give you nothing. Step into the service of the Master who provides, and find, as the ayah promises, that it is the only place a person is ever truly free.

A dua from this day

رَبِّ أَوْزِعْنِىٓ أَنْ أَشْكُرَ نِعْمَتَكَ ٱلَّتِىٓ أَنْعَمْتَ عَلَىَّ وَعَلَىٰ وَٰلِدَىَّ وَأَنْ أَعْمَلَ صَٰلِحًا تَرْضَىٰهُ وَأَدْخِلْنِى بِرَحْمَتِكَ فِى عِبَادِكَ ٱلصَّٰلِحِينَ

Rabbi awzi'ni an ashkura ni'mataka allati an'amta alayya wa ala walidayya wa an a'mala salihan tardahu wa adkhilni bi-rahmatika fi ibadika as-salihin

My Lord, enable me to be grateful for Your favor which You have bestowed upon me and upon my parents and to do righteousness of which You approve. And admit me by Your mercy into [the ranks of] Your righteous servants. (Surah an-Naml 27:19)

What this example teaches

One picture, two men in a market, holds an argument for tawhid and ends as a portrait of freedom. These are the threads Nouman Ali Khan draws out of it.

  • The false gods are the powerless slave.

    The parable sets a slave who owns nothing and controls nothing beside the One who provides. The verses around it name what it argues: anything worshipped besides Allah owns no provision and has no power. To set a rival beside Allah is to set the helpless figure beside the Master.

  • He says owned, not just slave, on purpose.

    The word abd alone belongs to Allah; all of us are His servants. Adding 'owned' (mamluk) points the picture at someone owned by other than Allah. And the form hints it is an unnatural state: you were made free, a servant of Allah alone.

  • Allah gives before He asks.

    A master buys a slave for his own benefit. Allah opens the bond by providing for the servant, because you cannot benefit Him. Unlike the idols people fed to get something back, He wants nothing from you and gives first, from Himself, a good provision.

  • The servant of Allah is the one who gives.

    The powerless slave can do nothing; the servant of Allah is so provided for that he spends, in secret and in the open. Giving, which the Arabs tied to the powerful, here belongs to the abd. Real wealth in the picture is the slave who gives freely.

  • Slavery to Allah is freedom.

    Allah sets not two slaves side by side but a slave and a free man. To be owned by anything other than Allah is bondage; to serve the One who provides is liberty. Nouman Ali Khan calls this an ayah of freedom itself.

Why this image stays with you

Two men in a market. One owned, able to do nothing, kept for a use and worth nothing beyond it. One given so much that his hands are always open. The Qur'an holds them up and asks if they are the same, and the question is really about every rival we are tempted to set beside Allah, every powerless thing we hand our lives to as if it could provide for us. It cannot. Only the Master who gives before He asks can do that, and His service is the one place the human heart was made to stand.

So step out of the line of the owned, and into the freedom of belonging to Him alone. O Allah, free us from every master that takes and gives nothing, and let us serve only You, who provide before we even ask; make us of the grateful, generous with what You have given, open-handed in secret and in the open, and gather us among Your righteous servants. Rabbi awzi'ni an ashkura ni'mataka. Ameen.

Questions

Where is this parable in the Qur'an?
Surah an-Nahl 16:75. It comes right after Allah describes the false gods who own no provision and have no power (16:73) and warns against striking comparisons for Him (16:74). A companion parable follows in 16:76 and is the subject of day twenty-six.
What is the example actually about?
Tawhid: that there is one true Master worth worshipping. The owned slave who controls nothing stands for the false gods, which own nothing and can give nothing, while the One who provides good provision stands for Allah. The question 'are they equal?' is the whole argument. Nouman Ali Khan keeps the image where the ayah keeps it: on ownership and provision, not on the institution of slavery.
Why does Allah add the word 'owned' if 'slave' already means owned?
Because in the Qur'an the word abd (servant, slave) on its own belongs to Allah: all of humanity are His servants. Adding mamluk, 'owned,' redirects the picture to someone owned by other than Allah. Nouman Ali Khan also notes the form suggests an unnatural state, a person who came to be owned, hinting that being enslaved to anything besides Allah was never our original condition.
How can the parable be about freedom when it describes a slave?
Because Allah does not set two slaves side by side; He sets a slave beside a free man. The one owned by another can do nothing, while the one in Allah's service is so provided for that he gives freely. The point Nouman Ali Khan draws is that slavery to anything other than Allah is bondage, and being a servant of Allah is the only real freedom.
Why does the verse say 'Praise to Allah' in the middle of the example?
Right after asking 'can they be equal?', the verse answers itself: alhamdulillah, all praise belongs to Allah. It is both the obvious reply (of course they are not equal) and a model of the free servant's response, gratitude. The free man in the picture lives in exactly that posture: he gives because his Master gives, and his life is one long thank-you.

Go deeper into the library

Retold faithfully from Nouman Ali Khan's Striking Examples From the Qur'an, episode 25 (the owned slave and the free man, an-Nahl 16:75). Qur'an: Sahih International, verified via quran.ai. The teaching is Nouman Ali Khan's, the phrasing is Buruja's.

Carry it today

The false gods are the powerless slave.

The parable sets a slave who owns nothing and controls nothing beside the One who provides. The verses around it name what it argues: anything worshipped besides Allah owns no provision and has no power. To set a rival beside Allah is to set the helpless figure beside the Master.

What stayed with you?

A private note, kept only on this device. Find it again on your journey page.

Watch the lecture

This retelling is drawn from Nouman Ali Khan's Striking Examples From the Qur'an series. Watch the original on YouTube:

Watch episode 25Full Striking Examples playlist on YouTube →

One example a day, a new picture to carry.

Subscribe, free